Examples of using "Evidencia" in a sentence and their english translations:
- I have evidence.
- I've got evidence.
The evidence is indisputable.
Get me the evidence.
We only need good evidence.
we need excellent evidence.
and there's no evidence to suggest
We must destroy the evidence.
The evidence is clear.
despite the lack of any scientific evidence.
Although there is no complete evidence
Dan attempted to destroy evidence.
no evidence for any genetic effects.
material evidence, DNA, fingerprints, fibers.
The evidence was against me.
Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence.
The evidence speaks for itself.
Stop embarrassing yourself.
There is a very simple evidence for this:
and talk a little bit about anecdotal evidence
That's when we began to see evidence
And only last year, we finally published evidence
Because evidence forces you to prove it.
The evidence convinced us of his innocence.
Is there any evidence that supports his position?
- There's no evidence.
- There is no evidence.
You'll embarrass Tom.
Sean's role is to pass evidence
gathered all the scientific evidence
and provide anecdotal evidence of their own experiences
even though we don't have definitive evidence
"Evidence for deposition of ten million tons
Moreover the evidence tracks the fingerprint of the cataclysm
All of the would-be evidence that ghosts exist
This new car will put other cars to shame.
There is much documented evidence to prove evolution.
the evidence presented in this paper rules out any possibility
Despite the abundant evidence of the impact proxies,
We had found evidence for a rebel leader, a guerrilla fighter,
We need an education informed by empirical evidence.
But even evidence may not be proof.
We got some special evidence that proves that he is guilty.
The police planted evidence at the crime scene.
there's no evidence of any increase in cancer,
And the way this happens, evidence is showing
Because the scientific evidence that proved it happened
certain cancers, but emerging evidence suggests
But true expertise is found on evidence.
If it's true, is it backed up by large-scale evidence?
And only with evidence can we move from a post-truth world
the five evidence-based solutions for what does work.
These walls are evidence of the Roman and Carolingian times.
The policeman went over the room in search for evidence.
that finding an evidence of life out of the Earth
"Evidence for extraterrestrial impact 12,900 years ago
consistent with major cosmic impact 12,800 years ago."
they lost that advantage, which again, it just shows us further evidence
Unfortunately, we cannot reach the evidence supporting these claims.
We currently have no evidence that a violent crime has occurred.
There is evidence that water was abundant on Mars eons ago.
The police found evidence that the man committed the crime.
Try to investigate in depth the cultural values your text brings into evidence.
When he was faced with the evidence, he had to admit that he was guilty.
There's a lot of scientific evidence being published and accumulating
If both people remain silent, the police don't have a lot of evidence,
Items of clothing and duct tape were potential traces of evidence.
There's no evidence this disease is caused by diet.
Tom's fingerprint was evidence that he was there.
Dan's version of the story didn't match the evidence.
The detective was accused of planting evidence at the scene of the crime.
A severed penis constitutes a solid piece of evidence for rape.
And there's overwhelming evidence that diet and lifestyle
But despite this, despite the evidence connecting terrorism and counterfeiting,
- There's no evidence.
- There's no proof.
So there might not be any empirical, scientific evidence that shows that ghosts exist,
When he was faced with the evidence, he had to admit that he was guilty.
As far back as we can trace human life, there’s evidence that almost every culture
In this book called "The 8-Hour Diet" there's evidence that if you restrict
and that's my opinion, but I think there's a lot of evidence to support that.
I still think it's unlikely that we'll find any evidence to prove Tom's guilt.
There's no evidence that Tom has done anything illegal.
There are good grounds for the view that Paris was the scene of frequent riots even before the revolution of 1789.
The evidence is laid out before us. Considering that, together with the fact that he has no alibi, there's no question that he's the guilty one.
The walking stick serves the purpose of an advertisement that the bearer's hands are employed otherwise than in useful effort, and it therefore has utility as an evidence of leisure.
All History shows: idioms of dominant states often lead to the disappearance of the languages of the dominated states. Greek engulfed the Phrygian. Latin killed the Iberian and Gallic. Currently, 25 languages are disappearing every year! Understand one thing: I'm not fighting against English, I fight for diversity. An Armenian proverb wonderfully summarizes my thought: "The more languages you know, the more you are a person."